SEX (now that I have your attention)…
18 MayAll sexuals are equal. Some are just more equal than others.
We are all sexual creatures of some ilk. Male and female created He them. Whether one believes in intelligent design or crazy chaos, that’s the easy part: the black and white, the yin and yang, the yes and no. But nothing’s really that easy. There are more than 50 shades of gray, more maybes than yes and no. At least that’s how it seems to me.
I’m a doctor, but not that kind of doctor. Certainly not a Sex Doctor, and certainly not like Dr. Ruth or Dr. Phil or whoever is in vogue these days. As they say, the higher one climbs the education ladder, the more one knows about less and less. The less and less part is becoming more and more apparent as I get older. But, as I age, the more and more I think I understand about life and living and who I am. Whoever that is. Ok, maybe I don’t know any more, but I’m just more comfortable with not knowing.
I don’t claim to be an expert on very many things and certainly not on the subject of homosexuality. I don’t know if it, like life, begins at conception or if environment plays a role. Probably a little of both. I don’t know if anyone would choose to be gay, if given the choice, or not. I’m not even sure where I slide on the 0 to 6 Kinsey Scale. Probably, like most people, somewhere in between.
I believe that God (yes, God) created male and female primarily for two purposes: 1) procreation (so the Creator wouldn’t have to populate the world by making mud figures every seven days) and 2) companionship—God’s and ours. Those who procreate maybe provide all the companionship they need. Those of us who don’t maybe need to find it somewhere else. Life can certainly provide strange bedfellows, so to speak. Currently, I am content with the furry four-legged kind—for companionship, that is; we certainly don’t even consider procreation (though if I could have kittens, I might have a litter)—but it’s definitely not in our nature.
I also believe what’s natural is generally the best way. If it fits, you must commit (or something like that). As the song says (in spite of its poor grammar), “if it don’t fit, don’t force it; just relax and let it go.” I mean, there’s a reason things are made the way they are. And, yes, I still believe in reasons, in spite of all the inexplicable chaos swirling around us. I have a Touchstone, kind of like “Base” or “Home” when playing Tag or Hide and Seek—a rock, an anchor, if you will, that keeps me centered, (for the most part) calm, primarily positive and optimistic in a way that is even more inexplicable to those around me than the chaos they readily concede. It’s a peace that truly passes understanding. I like that, because I don’t have to try to figure it out. I can just Be.
I recognize anomalies. Diversions, perversions, in and out of the box, and all that. Mistakes are made (so I’m told), but one man’s ceiling is another’s floor, so who’s to say which is up and which is down. Alice certainly had a hard time wrapping her elongated head around it. I don’t know if what is normal is just more predictable or probable. For example, I have the most common type of blood—O+ I think—but that doesn’t deny the As and ABs, just because they are more rare; the negatives, just because mine’s positive. I embrace the differences, celebrate multiculturalism, prefer the unique over the commonplace most of the time. I even received a Diversity Award; it’s hanging on my office wall, if anyone needs proof.
I don’t believe the tail should wag the dog, not in a democracy. Majority rules, but it shouldn’t rule with an iron hand. I do believe any percentage of the population deserves the same rights as the rest, regardless of how small or different. That’s America, land that I love, and I wouldn’t trade it for the world.
But bigger and better than America, land of the free, is the Kingdom of God where there is no male nor female (gay nor straight), black nor white, Jew nor Gentile. We are all equal in the eyes of God: equally sinners, yet equally forgiven. More than equally loved beyond all measure, inexplicably so. That’s certainly worth embracing, even if it passes comprehension.
As an educated scholar, I know what the Bible has to say about homosexuality—I’ve researched it, from Old to New Testament, Greek to English. What is direct and what is interpretation, what is black and white and what is gray, who’s to say—maybe someone else can and will, but not I. I leave that up to the Source itself. When Jesus forgave the woman caught in sin and sent her accusers (who were not without sin) away without throwing a stone, he had a private conversation with her. “Neither do I condemn you,” he said when they were alone, adding, “Go and sin no more.” If gays are sinning, that’s between them and God; if they are to go and sin no more, let them hear it from God themselves. IF they are listening; that effort has to be theirs. Whether or not one can help being the way one is pales, I think, when one considers what pleases Almighty God. That’s a daily task, an individual quest, if we’re really serious about hearing God’s voice and placing priority on following the direction of the Holy Spirit.
But make no mistake (as someone who makes a lot of them is fond of saying): there’s no ambiguity about the Gospel—the Good News for Everyone. As for Christians, gay or straight, if we are listening, then none of us can help but hear the proclamation: “God so loved the world.” And if we continue to listen even with half an ear, the subsequent commandment comes through loud and clear: “Love the Lord your God with all your heart and soul and mind and love your neighbor as yourself.” Later, John even reduced the sermon to just three words: “Love one another.”
So this is what I do know for sure: we are all loved. We are, in return, to love everyone else. That’s what makes us all more equal than others.
End of story.
The Imitation Game: too real to be an imitation
29 DecLoneliness, from the Swahili: “that place in the forest where one sits down and cries out, ‘Oh, mother! I am lost.’”
The Imitation Game (2014), starring the ubiquitous Benedict Cumberbatch as Alan Turing, pioneer of computer science and code-breaker of the “unbreakable” German Enigma code, is an important and moving film, but not just as an intense, race-against-the-clock World War II thriller, but also for its expose of society’s penchant for stoning its own prophets. Turing, instead of being lionized for shortening the war by an estimated two years with his invention of “Christopher,” the prototype for the first computer, was convicted of “gross indecency” (1940’s code for “homosexual”), a punishment that broke him not unlike the imprisonment of Oscar Wilde for similar charges, shortening his own life and its incomparable contributions to the fledgling computer age.
All that aside, though, as many others undoubtedly will voice opinions and accolades for the aforementioned and worthy components of Morten Tildum’s thoughtfully directed drama. Based on Andrew Hodges’ 1983 biography, Alan Turing: The Enigma, screenwriter Graham Moore is faithful to the facts, while reasonably highlighting elements of a more timely agenda. Fans of PBS’ popular series Bletchley Circle, of which I am one, might be intrigued by another look at the famous World War II British cryptographers, but today’s audience’s attention more likely will be drawn to the “gross unfairness” of the manner in which gays were treated in not-so-bygone decades.
Writer Craig Warner and directors Clare Beavan and Nic Stacey already had turned the lens to Turing’s troubled personal life in their Codebreaker, a quiet 2012 documentary examining the life of the little-known mathematic genius. Not having read the book prior to seeing the film—something I rarely allow myself to do—I had prepared myself for the current movie by catching the documentary on Netflix. Ed Stoppard’s depiction of the enigmatic Turing is as laudable as Cumberbatch’s, though the popular star of the Sherlock Holmes series will likely win a well-deserved Academy Award for Best Actor this spring.
Not so worthy, perhaps, is Keira Knightley’s portrayal of Turing’s colleague and lukewarm love interest Joan Clarke, though a possible Oscar for this over-rated British femme fatale already is being bandied about. Knightley does give a more mature rendering in her role of Clarke than her usual childish one-dimensional effort, but only a little more. (That she was engaging in her 2002 breakout role as a soccer-playing teen in Bend it Like Beckham, the fact that she has not grown since in spite of meaty roles thrown her by capable directors should not entitle her to tributes now.) Her title as the current-reigning “Demi Moore Flavor of the Month Actress” remains secure in my educated opinion.
The actor who does steal the show, however, revealing layers of unsounded depths of character development, is an unknown child by the name of Alex Lawther. It is his realization of the young schoolboy Turing on whom I want to shower both attention and accolades. His studied empathy with the lonely, tortured genius Turing surely was evokes the truest sympathy, especially when the young actor refuses to allow emotion to escape beyond the tormented look in his soulful eyes when he learns of the death of his only friend. Later, when Cumberbatch’s Turing discloses his deepest fears of being left alone—the fact that he has named his invention after this one friend so that he can keep him close and “alive” is heart-breaking enough—the most valuable verity of the story is exposed. The price one pays for being different—genius, homosexual, whatever—of never being completely understood or requited is a loneliness only others who are as different on an equal level can ever comprehend. Although I do not qualify for membership in any of Turing’s categories, that “deep calls to deep” in me, so to speak, and makes this specific message of this multi-messaged film so poignant and memorable.
Sure, other movies have portrayed the isolated genius, the unwelcomed outcaste; many have done it well. The Imitation Game, however, is inimitable this year, if not for all time.
Shadow Castle
27 OctI dreamt of gold and woke to sheets of it streaming off me.
We were waiting around the royal swimming pool for Queen Elizabeth to arrive to celebrate her royal birthday. The hours passed slowly, and Her Royal Highness was yet to show. Prince Phillip appeared from time to time to promise us she would be there soon, but most of the gathered royal-watchers were beginning to give up hope. Disappointed and disillusioned, several moved to retrieve their coats, leave their presents on the royal table. Desperate to prove them wrong—to ourselves as much as to our fellow partiers—my friend Mary Ann and I grasped hands and jumped fully clothed into the deep-end of the pool. Instinctively we knew that if the water turned to gold when we resurfaced, the promises would be true. We also knew it wasn’t Her Majesty we were waiting for, but Him. As we ascended, sheets of gold streamed from us, head to toe. Tears of joy mingled with the shimmering water; we shouted in our elation, our conviction, our blessed assurance.
Thus, my dream. My dreams are vivid and unique, incessant and recurring. People often wonder at their meaning, ponder their source. Some would say I read too much. Guilty as charged. I always have. From before I could read the words myself, books have been my drug of choice; since I have learned to read, I have mainstreamed words and stories like any self-respecting junkie. And I horde my paraphernalia in rooms of shelves like used needles piled in every corner.
One of my favorite books when I first learned to read was Shadow Castle, a modern fairy tale by Marian Cockrell. I still have the worn Scholastic paperback somewhere, in spite of cat pee stains (and odor), testament to my dedication never to part with it: throw it away or wish it on some unsuspecting book sale. I loved fairy tales—The Blue Book, the Pink Book, Grimm’s, Anderson—and even those by authors whose names I can’t recall. They were more than stories; they were possibilities.
More than anything, I wanted to be a fairy. As a child, I haunted the bright green “fairy rings” in my grandparents’ pasture, hoping against hope of glimpsing an ethereal form, listening for the whirr of iridescent wings. I dreamed of flying, escaping all manner of wicked pursuers, blending invisible with the friendly shadows. I was beyond grateful for my blue-ringed green eyes and slightly pointy ears, acquiesced to being “corrie-fisted,” switching the pencil readily from my right hand to my left. If only, if only…
Like Emily, I dwelt “in possibility, a fairer place than prose…” And when the mortal man in Shadow Castle who had fallen in love with the fairy princess was obliged to exchange 100 years and a day in fairy land while his elfin love was sentenced to serve the same time on this side if they wanted to spend eternity together, I entered that banishment with him, just in case, clapping my hands as Peter commanded, lest some fairy’s light become extinguished.
“If you want your children to be intelligent, read them fairy tales; if you want them to be more intelligent, read them more fairy tales,” that genius Albert Einstein supposedly opined. As a child, I was a voracious reader, obsessed; as an adult, I am just as ravenous, addicted. As I have aged this side of paradise, I read more fairy tales, discovering Tir-na-Nog (Land of Forever Young) and W. B. Yeats and Lady Gregory who, being Irish and intelligent, took the wee folk (nee, “The Shining Ones”) more seriously even than I have. Like Yeats, older and wiser, I follow the light cast by the sacred mythology out of the darkness of the abyss.
Shadow Castle got its name from the shady silhouettes flickering on its walls, evidence of those just across the border of the Other World. As the century-sentence drew to a close when the mortal and his fairy love would be reunited, the shadows became more restless, fluttering with impatient anticipation for the spell to be broken. Little more than a shade, a wraith myself, I, too, pace behind these boundaries, waiting to be set free. And now, the days grow shorter: 99, 100, 1…
Many have called it a myth, nothing more than a child’s fairy tale, this promise of the Rapture. But wiser men, like Einstein and Yeats, have seen beneath the surface, into the abyss and beyond, to where the Truth lives, shining and forever young. “The foolishness of God is wiser than men…”
I dream of gold and wake to sheets of it streaming off me.
–Rebecca Luttrell Briley
Thoroughbreds on US 62
16 OctIf you come by the road that cuts through the horse farms
Stonewall, Chanteclaire, Vinegar Hill—
A running stitch of rock fences hemming raw edges
Spires and steeples on one side, brown stubble and stalk, the other—
On both sides: bluegrass bluebloods, enduring as trees.
If you come as the crow flies over a quilt, shades of motherland green
Darby, Shadow Lane, Waterford Stud—
(those stitches, standing witness to Famine survival)
Acknowledge their stillness, patient as statues
Long-suffering sentinels, dark in the rain.
–Rebecca Luttrell Briley
16 October 2014
Ain’t We Got Fun
6 Oct
“Is everything supposed to be fun?” I looked at Banu* to see if she was teasing; she was completely serious. I had just said to her, “We have the whole day just to have fun! What would you like to do?” This was a rare occurrence, of course; there are few days where there is nothing planned or needs taking care of. This was as rare as a day in June in October. I asked what she meant.
“Maybe it’s a cultural thing,” she began. I already knew where this was going before she started to explain. “In Turkey, everything isn’t fun. It’s not supposed to be. Fun is what happens as a reward at the end of everything else. You work hard–you expect to work hard–and then, maybe, you’ll get a treat. In America, though, it seems like everything has to be fun from the beginning, or it won’t work.”
I knew what she meant. We have fluffed up and dummied down everything so that everyone will be enticed to do whatever needs doing. We give “rewards” just to get others to do what they are supposed to do in the first place. We have even reduced the number of things that need to be done by having other people do them for us. We are indulged, spoiled. We have gotten flabby.
No where is this more evident than in our school systems. Give a student a “C” for meeting the requirements (the definition of C-work…), and they scream bloody murder for their expected “A.” No more is an “A” awarded only for “publishable work,” as I was told to maintain when teaching for the University of Kentucky at the beginning of my career. Today’s teachers often inflate the grades just to cut down on the screaming–or the bloody murder. Give the kids what they want, regardless of whether it’s good for them or they deserve it–just keep them pacified. Let them eat cake.
My country ’tis of thee, sweet land of Disney. I admitted it before Banu could call it. Much as we both love “Mary Poppins,” a “spoonful of sugar” may not always be the best way to take one’s medicine. No wonder we are a society of diabetics. Not all jobs are meant to be games, though there’s nothing wrong with enjoying one’s work and finding the fun where one can.
Banu’s beef with the “spoonful of sugar” method has grown out of her graduate work in American education (don’t get her started on her student-teaching experience), which has done little to convert her to our “progressive” way of doing everything. And I’m glad: I may sound predictably like the old fogey of a passing generation, complaining about the current kids’ music (that’s not music!), but she is young enough to be my daughter! That she prefers my music testifies to our shared good taste.
It wasn’t always this way. Even back in my own not-so-distant childhood, rewards were saved for special achievements. Just completing chores—and we did have them—wasn’t enough to warrant a treat. We were expected to do our work, to make the grade, to finish what we started. Life was just as uncertain back then, I guess, but we weren’t allow to have dessert first—or have it in place of dinner. My husband used to tell the story of being served the same cold spinach he refused at dinner for breakfast, then lunch, and then and only after he had managed to get it down was he allowed anything else to eat, let alone dessert. Today his parents would be hauled in for child abuse; then, they were respected for being firm. I hate to say, “back in the day”–it’s cliché now–but back in the day, we worked, we earned, and on the special occasion, we might be given something extra. If we were lucky, not because we were entitled to it. It wasn’t “barefoot in the snow 20 miles uphill” hyperbole; it just sounds like it now because such standards seem so archaic.
Beggars were not choosers. You liked what you got, not necessarily the other way around, or you “lumped” it, as they say. I was teaching a class recently where I gave out fortune cookies for a writing assignment (even our object lessons have to be fun, sweet); a student crumpled his up and threw it in the trash. “I don’t like fortune cookies,” he whined. “Don’t you have some Oreos or something?” “No,” I said evenly, trying to keep my temper in check, “and that’s too bad, because that’s your assignment, and now you either won’t have one, or you’ll have to fish yours out of the garbage and eat it anyway.” Even then I was afraid he’d report me to my dean for not offering multiple choices for all eating and writing pleasures.
Tennessee Williams’ “work like a Turk” may apply best to Banu’s ethnicity (though I suspect Williams just appreciated the rhyme), but Americans used to be known for their work ethic. Even today we aren’t the only ones who have fallen prey to easy way. I think of a certain Nobel Peace Prize given before the recipient had done anything to earn it–just on the “promise” that he might. I wonder if the Swedes are wiping egg off their faces as our government bombs the bits out of Syria. Not that ISIS doesn’t deserve what it gets—and more: it’s just funny, that’s all. Funny, but not fun.
*Banu, my Turkish graduate student roommate whom I met while teaching in Cyprus
Late September (first back at home)
26 Sep
A swath of gossamer veils the valley.
In the air, the whinnied evidence I’ve been listening for
And the hint of lathered leather wafting from what’s hidden in the trees.
Already, the morning sky prematurely October blues as bushes catch fire
And roses spill final petals in a pinked carpet for the arrival of the long-anticipated time.
But leaves remain uncoaxed, coated still in summer’s stubborn shade.
Patience. Though we can taste it.
Reaching, I strip one tertiary branch to prime the pump.
Southern Scorpio
21 SepBad Joke:
Q: What’s the difference between a Northern girl and a Southern girl?
A: The Northern girl has a canopy over her bed, the Southern girl has a can o’ pee under her bed.
I got my feelings hurt the other day. No biggie. I’m not the easily offended, wear my heart on my sleeve type. Not always looking for ways to feel “dissed” so I can raise a ruckus, “Poor me! Look at me! Wah, wah, wah!” There’s been too much Political Correctness for my taste, and I would never contribute to it if I could help it.
So it’s still a man’s world. What of it. So there used to be slavery. Get over it. So I bumped my head on a glass ceiling. Whatever. So the circle is still unbroken, but I’m on the other side. Blah, blah, blah. Maybe if we weren’t so self-absorbed, we wouldn’t see so many bruises on our thin skins. Fewer selfies=less whining.
So I got my feelings hurt. That’s the last you’ll hear of it. And the one who did the wounding will never hear of it, at least not from me. And it won’t happen again. But not because that person won’t ride rough-shod another time—they likely will. And not necessarily because I will be more assertive and stand up for myself more readily next time, either.
But you need to know two things about a person, me: where they were born and when.
That may seem irrelevant, but it’s something I’ve come to know, regardless of what I may believe. Heart wisdom over head knowledge, so to speak. Let me explain.
It’s important to know if someone is from the North or the South (mid-west, west coast, maybe not so much). North? Abrupt. Pragmatic. Cold. South? More nuanced, multi-layered. Temperate. At the risk of stereotyping (is that some kind of profiling?), and though there are exceptions, it has been my experience that people from the North can come across as rude, at least to Southerners who aren’t used to such ascorbic speech. People from the South may appear more amicable—the soft, proverbial “Bless your heart” (I really mean it), but really they are just more subtle. Just because they let you win, doesn’t mean you win.
Yankees, you may blunder your way in brusquely, like it matters—and I, Southerner that I am (albeit the upper South), may let you. On the surface. You may not mean anything by it, just saving time for clarity. And I may understand that. But it will never be water under my bridge. Water from the North? Cascades shallowly, noisily down on its way from somewhere to somewhere else. Southern water runs deeper, more silent, may even appear somewhat stagnant. Though it’s not.
You can skip all the rocks you want across my smooth surface, but they will collect at the bottom of my deepest pools and never get washed away. Collecting, they will form a wall below that surface you will never penetrate again, a “glass” wall, if you will, that you will never even know is there.
And the other thing? When I was born? Just know I am a Scorpio. Believe or not, but know this much is true: a Scorpio never forgets.
So bless your heart a hundred times. You’ll never see mine again.
–Rebecca Luttrell Briley


